/*
* Copyright (C) 2016 The Guava Authors
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
package com.google.common.collect;
import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
A dummy superclass to support GWT serialization of the element type of an ImmutableMultiset
. The GWT supersource for this class contains a field of type E
. For details about this hack, see GwtSerializationDependencies
, which takes the same approach but with a subclass rather than a superclass.
TODO(cpovirk): Consider applying this subclass approach to our other types.
For ImmutableMultiset
in particular, I ran into a problem with the
GwtSerializationDependencies
approach: When autogenerating a serializer for the new class, GWT tries to refer to our dummy serializer for the superclass, ImmutableMultiset_CustomFieldSerializer. But that type has no methods (since it's never actually used). We could probably fix the problem by adding dummy methods to that class, but that is starting to sound harder than taking the superclass approach, which I've been coming to like, anyway, since it doesn't require us to declare dummy methods (though occasionally constructors) and make types non-final.
/**
* A dummy superclass to support GWT serialization of the element type of an {@link
* ImmutableMultiset}. The GWT supersource for this class contains a field of type {@code E}.
*
* <p>For details about this hack, see {@link GwtSerializationDependencies}, which takes the same
* approach but with a subclass rather than a superclass.
*
* <p>TODO(cpovirk): Consider applying this subclass approach to our other types.
*
* <p>For {@code ImmutableMultiset} in particular, I ran into a problem with the {@code
* GwtSerializationDependencies} approach: When autogenerating a serializer for the new class, GWT
* tries to refer to our dummy serializer for the superclass,
* ImmutableMultiset_CustomFieldSerializer. But that type has no methods (since it's never actually
* used). We could probably fix the problem by adding dummy methods to that class, but that is
* starting to sound harder than taking the superclass approach, which I've been coming to like,
* anyway, since it doesn't require us to declare dummy methods (though occasionally constructors)
* and make types non-final.
*/
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
abstract class ImmutableMultisetGwtSerializationDependencies<E> extends ImmutableCollection<E> {}